back, baby number one (residency one)

...back in time. i'm going to treat a few blog entries as a back-track. not really rue to blogging fashion but a ghood way to catalog my thought for my graduate work. so let's begin. way on back to over a year ago at the first snowy vermont residency (super cold). i'll get out my trusty notebook and let thoughts fly.

i brought green rivers/aerial work. all cramped in the little space. i had fifteen critiques that week. (i was all business). i listened to my recording of my crits right after each one- transcribing them all and recorded them by making pink tabs in my sketchbook where crit notes were.





allan de souza:my first cit (i think) and allan was a guest critter. everyone else did the talking. do i need to hold on to the river reference? "why re-do the problem of landscape vs. abstraction?"

mike glier: formal issues. be confident.

moyra davey (one-on-one): peter handke. uneasyness. mary heilman. do more photos and maybe show them with paintings.

lynn i.: danoka (featherboard)

martin:?

tsao:?

wangechi mutu: try dripping. get rid of the precious little frames (i did). too pre-meditated and heady. "i don't want to see what you think."

janet kaplan: anxious. when a thing comes toward you it's about paranois.

sowon kwon: lee bontique. traditional wester pictorial representation. why bring the photo back to painting?

marie shurkus: creat new problems. visions of america book. stones, bb king, robert johnson, blind willie. i dont' remember if this is what we talked about- but i wrote in on the marie page.

g baker (guest lecturer): richter. and purple is problematic.

sharon hayes: think about parallell relationship of work and titles. and audience.

michael willis: huh.

todd bartel: why paint? why square? why landscape?

k. brooke: narrative titles

david deitcher: the color is just not happening.